Reviews January 4, 2024 7 min read

Intercontinental Ras Al Khaimah: Close, But No Waldorf

A five-star with real potential on Ras Al Khaimah's coast, undone by beach and toilet basics.

Intercontinental Ras Al Khaimah: Close, But No Waldorf

Out of Ten Verdict

5.5/10
MAYBE

A five-star with real potential on Ras Al Khaimah's coast, dragged down by one hygiene failure and a villa layout that doesn't suit families.

A private man-made beach, an all-inclusive package, and beach villas at a newer five-star on the Ras Al Khaimah coast. We came in with high expectations, set by the Waldorf Astoria down the road — the only other five-star we'd tried in the area. We travelled as five: two adults, two teenagers and a toddler.

The Verdict

Good bones, patchy execution. The property looks the part, the food is genuinely strong, and on a better day this scores in the sevens. Two things stop it. One is a hygiene incident that no five-star gets to explain away and which, under our rubric, is an automatic red card. The other is a beach villa layout that split our family of five across two unconnected buildings. Strip out the hygiene failure and this is a different review — which is precisely why it matters that it happened at all.

Booking & Arrival●●●●○○○○○○4/10The rollaway bed for our toddler, confirmed by email in advance, wasn't ready at check-in — the kind of prep a five-star shouldn't fumble.
Space & Setting●●●●●●●○○○7/10Beach villas are large and three minutes from everything, but they don't interconnect — we were split across two, teens below, us and the toddler above, separate external doors. Scored on the villas; main-building rooms may suit families better.
Cleanliness●●●○○○○○○○3/10Human waste found on a cleaning hose in a toilet near the buffet restaurant. Wet floors in the pool-bar toilets throughout. A red card, and the single biggest drag on the total.
Service●●●●●○○○○○5/10Individually warm, collectively disorganised — orders forgotten, poor handover between departments.
Food & Drink●●●●●●●●○○8/10High standard across every restaurant, no exceptions. All-inclusive doesn't cut corners on quality, though drink range is limited.
Pool●●●●●●○○○○6/10Fine in itself, but toilet and access provision nearby is the weak link of the whole stay.
Sunbeds & Beach●●●●●○○○○○5/10Beds 4, sand 6. Comfortable loungers on a private man-made beach with watersports, wrecked by towel-reservation abuse going unpoliced for hours and tired, damaged umbrellas.
Extras●●●●●○○○○○5/10Watersports on site and a villa-guests-only Turkish breakfast are good. Against: clumsy QR food ordering, two mixed toilets for the entire pool bar, no sports bar and nowhere for teenagers to go after dinner.
Feel●●●●●●○○○○6/10Relaxed dress code, which we prefer. But evenings are the flat spot — the lounge bar fills with local families keeping to themselves and the alternative is the smoking bar.
Value●●●●●●○○○○6/10All-inclusive genuinely lowers the cost, though drink choice is limited. We gambled on the top room category and it's the part that disappointed.

The Scorecard

  • Booking & Arrival — 4/10 — A rollaway bed for our toddler was requested at booking and confirmed by email in advance. It wasn't ready at check-in. Small thing on paper, but it's the first impression, it's the one item you genuinely can't improvise with a small child in tow, and it set the tone for the disorganisation that followed.
  • Space & Setting — 7/10 — Beach villas are genuinely large, closer to a hotel suite than a standard villa, and only a three-minute walk from restaurants, beach and pool. Décor is clean, modern and reads five-star throughout. The problem is that they don't interconnect. Travelling as five — two adults, two teenagers and a toddler — we were split across two separate villas, with the teenagers below us and the three of us above, each reached by its own external door. No internal stairs, no connecting door. Worth being clear that this score is on the villas specifically: we paid up for the top category as a gamble on luxury and it's the one part of the stay that didn't pay off. A cheaper room in the main building would likely handle a family better, and we'd take that trade next time.
  • Cleanliness — 3/10 — One instance of human waste on a cleaning hose in a toilet near the buffet restaurant, plus persistently wet floors in the two toilets serving the pool bar. The rubric treats anything below 8 here as a red card, and this is well below.
  • Service — 5/10 — Individually friendly, collectively disorganised. Orders forgotten, communication between departments poor.
  • Food & Drink — 8/10 — Consistently high standard across every restaurant tried, with the all-inclusive not cutting corners on quality. Drink range is the limiting factor.
  • Pool — 6/10 — Fine, but access and toilet provision around it is the weak point of the whole stay.
  • Sunbeds & Beach — 5/10 (beds 4, sand 6) — Comfortable beds and helpful staff when asked, on a private man-made beach with watersports on site. Undone by towel reservations going unpoliced for hours while rule-followers get bumped after 45 minutes, and by tired, visibly damaged umbrellas.
  • Extras — 5/10 — Watersports on site and a weekend-only Turkish restaurant opening exclusively for villa guests are both genuine pluses. Against them: QR codes for sunbed food ordering go missing and staff can't locate guests, only two mixed toilets serve the entire pool bar area, and there's no sports bar anywhere on site.
  • Feel — 6/10 — No strict trousers-after-6pm rule, which we count as a plus, and only the odd football shirt at dinner to spoil it. But evenings are the flat spot: the main lounge bar fills with local families keeping to themselves and the smoking bar isn't an option if you don't smoke. With two teenagers, that gap is the whole evening — there is nowhere for them to go and nothing for them to do once dinner is finished. A family bar with a sports screen would fix a real gap.
  • Value — 6/10 — All-inclusive brings the cost down meaningfully, though drink choice is limited.

Overall: 5.5/10Would we return? Possibly, but in a main-building room rather than a beach villa, and not until the basics are fixed. Sunbed enforcement, toilets and check-in prep are all named, all cheap, and all still outstanding as of our stay.

A word on the number, because 5.5 looks harsh against a hotel we've just called good. It is almost entirely the cleanliness row doing the damage: our rubric treats anything below 8 there as a red card, deliberately, because it's the one thing a guest can't work around or forgive. A 3 in that row costs roughly half a point off the total on its own. Take the hygiene incident away and this property sits comfortably in the sixes, arguably the sevens. We're also scoring the room category we actually booked — the beach villas — and we chose those as a gamble on luxury rather than practicality. A cheaper main-building room might well score better on the family front. The 5.5 is a verdict on the stay we had, not a ceiling on the hotel.

Why this isn't an automatic NO. A row of 3 or below normally caps a verdict at NO regardless of the average — it is how the One & Only Royal Mirage ended up rated NO on a 6.1. The difference is that a cap is for a standing policy, not a one-off. The Royal Mirage's trousers-after-6pm rule is deliberate, enforced and will greet the next guest in exactly the same form. The hygiene failure here was an incident — serious, and scored as such at 3 — but one the hotel's own director was already engaged with and planning fixes for during our stay. So the 3 costs InterContinental roughly half a point and a red card, and it keeps a MAYBE. If the same thing turns up on a return visit, it stops being an incident and the cap applies.

The Good

  • Staff are friendly across the board, especially in the main restaurant and on the beach.
  • Décor is clean, modern, and reads five-star throughout.
  • Food is high standard in every restaurant, no exceptions.
  • The all-inclusive package brings costs down noticeably without cutting corners on food quality.
  • Beach villas are large — closer to a hotel suite than a standard villa — and only a three-minute walk from restaurants, beach, and pool.
  • A weekend-only Turkish restaurant opens exclusively for villa guests for buffet breakfast.

The Bad

  • The rollaway bed requested at booking wasn't ready at check-in, despite advance emails confirming it.
  • Beach umbrellas are tired, several visibly damaged — not what you want on show at a five-star.
  • Ordering food to a sunbed or pool lounger is clumsy: QR codes go missing from tables and staff struggle to locate guests.
  • Sunbed reservations by towel go unenforced for hours, sometimes all day, while guests who play by the rules get moved off beds after 45 minutes.
  • Only two mixed toilets serve the entire pool bar area — wet floors, long queues, not what you expect at this price point.
  • One instance of a genuinely unacceptable hygiene issue: human waste found on a cleaning hose in a toilet near the buffet restaurant.
  • No sports bar on site — nowhere to watch a match.
  • Beach villas don't interconnect. As a family of five we were split across two separate villas — teenagers below, parents and toddler above — each with its own external door and no internal link between them. Workable, but you shouldn't be stepping outside to check on your kids at a five-star.
  • Nothing for teenagers after dinner. No sports bar, no games room, and a lounge bar that fills with local families keeping to themselves.

The Detail

The dress code here is relaxed — no strict trousers-after-6pm rule, which we count as a plus (see our review of the One & Only Royal Mirage for the alternative). The odd football shirt at dinner is the only mild eyesore. Evenings are the flat spot: the main lounge bar tends to fill with local families keeping to themselves, and the smoking bar isn't an option if you're not a smoker. A dedicated family bar with a sports screen would fix a real gap.

One practical note for families. The beach villas sleep you comfortably but they do not interconnect, and the resort's answer to a party of five was two separate villas stacked one above the other, each accessed by its own external door. Our teenagers were below, we were above with the toddler. In daylight it's a non-issue and the three-minute walk to everything is genuinely good. At night, with a toddler asleep upstairs and teenagers behind a door you can only reach by going outside, it stops feeling like a five-star arrangement and starts feeling like two hotel rooms that happen to be near each other. If you need to stay connected as a group, ask before you book, because on the villas the answer is no — and consider whether a main-building room would serve you better for less money. We went the other way, paid for the privilege, and it's the one call we'd reverse.

Book the beach villas expecting a private, quiet stay with good walking distance to everything — but budget for more than one if your group won't fit in a single unit, since they don't connect. One of the hotel's directors was visibly engaged on the beach during our stay and mentioned improvements were already planned for the food-ordering system and toilet provision. Whether that's landed yet is worth checking before you book.

We paid, in full, every time. No comps. No gifts. No affiliate money from anyone mentioned here.

— Out of Ten